How to Measure Activity in SPACE Metrics

Metrics That Matter: How to Measure Activity in SPACE Metrics 🚀

Imagine this: You’re leading a software engineering team, and on the surface, everything looks great. Your team is buzzing with activity, pull requests are flowing like water, and code is being merged left and right. You’re thinking, Wow, we’re on fire!

But then… 🚨 A major bug slips into production. Features aren’t performing as expected. Customers are confused. Suddenly, you realize all that activity hasn’t translated into meaningful progress.

In the world of software development, it’s easy to mistake being busy for being productive. That’s where the SPACE framework comes in, and today, we’re tackling Activity—one of the most misunderstood metrics.

🚀 Here’s What We’ll Cover Today:

• ✨ What is Activity in SPACE metrics?
• ✨ Why measuring activity can be tricky (and dangerous)
• ✨ How to measure meaningful activity in your engineering team
• ✨ How to ensure activity is driving results, not just noise

Let’s get to it! 🎉

🌟 What Is Activity in SPACE Metrics?

When we talk about Activity in the SPACE framework, we’re talking about the quantifiable actions that engineers perform. This could be anything from:

• The number of commits made 🖥️
• Pull requests submitted and merged
• Code reviews completed
• Tickets moved through the pipeline

At first glance, these metrics seem like perfect indicators of how much work is getting done. After all, if the commits are rolling in and code reviews are happening, your team must be crushing it, right?

Well… not necessarily. 🚦

Here’s the tricky part: More activity doesn’t always equal more value. In fact, it could just mean your team is stuck in busywork, or worse, fixing issues that shouldn’t have existed in the first place. So, how do we ensure that the activity we’re measuring is actually driving progress?

Let me tell you a story.

🛠️ The Story of Team Busybee vs. Team Focusforce

Meet Team Busybee. This team is constantly cranking out work. Their commit history is a thing of beauty—a steady flow of code going into the repo. Every day, they’re merging pull requests, closing Jira tickets, and checking off tasks like nobody’s business. But despite all the effort, their product updates fall flat. Features aren’t polished, bugs are frequent, and customer satisfaction is slipping.

Now, let’s look at Team Focusforce. They’re also working hard, but instead of focusing on volume, they prioritize meaningful work. Their commit history isn’t as long, but each commit delivers significant improvements. Their pull requests are thoughtful, and they focus on quality over quantity. When they ship features, customers are thrilled. Their product feels solid, and bugs are rare.

So what’s the difference?

Team Busybee measures activity based on how much they do. They’re optimizing for output, not outcomes.

Team Focusforce, on the other hand, looks at what they’re doing and why. They measure activity based on impact—making sure every piece of work moves the needle toward delivering value.

📊 Why Measuring Activity Can Be Tricky (and Dangerous)

Measuring activity without context can be like playing a game of telephone—you think you’re hearing one thing, but by the time it reaches your ears, the message is completely distorted. 🤷‍♀️

Here are some of the common pitfalls of measuring raw activity:

• Vanity metrics: You might feel good seeing lots of commits, but if those commits are just refactoring the same code or fixing avoidable bugs, they’re not adding real value.
• Encouraging busywork: If engineers know their work is judged by the number of pull requests or tickets closed, they might focus on pumping out low-value tasks just to keep those numbers up.
• Ignoring quality: Lots of commits or code reviews might mean that your team is active, but if the code quality is poor, you’re just creating future problems.

So, how do you make sure you’re measuring activity in a way that aligns with your team’s goals?

🚀 How to Measure Meaningful Activity in SPACE Metrics

Activity, when measured correctly, can give you powerful insights into how your team is functioning. Here’s how to make sure you’re capturing the right data.

1. Focus on Contextual Activity 📚

Don’t just count how many commits or pull requests your team makes—look at the context. Ask questions like:

• What type of work are we committing? Are these feature improvements, bug fixes, or just minor tweaks?
• How often are we making meaningful commits? Track activities that deliver actual value, like pushing a new feature to production or resolving a high-impact bug.

By focusing on the type of activity, you can avoid the trap of counting meaningless actions.

2. Balance Quantity with Quality ⚖️

Activity should be balanced with code quality. Lots of commits are great, but not if they introduce new bugs or technical debt. Include code quality metrics alongside activity, such as:

• Code review feedback: Are changes getting lots of review comments? Are there consistent quality issues that need fixing?
• Bug reports post-deployment: How often do features need patching after release?

By keeping an eye on quality, you can ensure that your activity is moving in the right direction.

3. Look at Flow Efficiency 🚦

Flow efficiency measures how much time your team spends actually working on a task versus waiting for something (like approvals or code reviews). High flow efficiency means that your team’s activity is uninterrupted and productive.

Track things like:

• Time spent in review: Are pull requests getting stuck waiting for approval?
• Time in progress: How long are tasks sitting in progress without updates?

By reducing blockers and bottlenecks, you’ll make sure your team’s activity is smooth and efficient.

4. Cross-Team Collaboration 🤝

Activity isn’t just about individual performance. It’s also about how your team collaborates and communicates with others. Measuring cross-team activity can help you understand the bigger picture:

• Code reviews across teams: Is your team working in silos, or are they contributing to other areas of the project?
• Inter-team pull requests: How often does your team collaborate with other teams? The more they do, the more aligned the entire organization becomes.

Encouraging collaboration not only improves the quality of work but also keeps activity aligned with broader business goals.

🌟 Turning Activity Into Results: The Key Takeaways

So, what’s the secret to measuring activity in SPACE metrics? It’s all about context and impact.

1. Focus on outcomes, not just output. Look beyond the number of commits and pull requests—focus on how much value they deliver.
2. Balance activity with quality. Ensure your team’s work isn’t just frequent, but also high-quality and meaningful.
3. Track flow efficiency. Eliminate blockers that slow your team’s activity, making sure their work flows smoothly from start to finish.
4. Encourage collaboration. Measuring activity across teams ensures that your team’s work is aligned with the organization’s broader goals.

Measuring activity is just one piece of the puzzle. When done right, it can help you identify trends, spot bottlenecks, and understand how your team is really performing. But don’t fall into the trap of focusing on how much is being done—focus on what is being done and why.

Want more insights on how to drive meaningful metrics? Check out productthinkers.com for more on SPACE metrics and other frameworks that can take your team to the next level!

If you enjoyed this post, consider supporting me by buying me a coffee! Your support helps me keep sharing more helpful content like this. Find me at: buymeacoffee.com/rubenalap. ☕